Research output
The Intricacies of Computational Electrochemistry
Abstract
Computational electrochemistry is hardanybody who has ever tried will know. We argue that the reasons for its complexity lie not only in the multiscale nature of electrochemical processes but also in the rapid, ongoing method development in the field. This has resulted in a lack of clear guidelines and many open discussions in the community. These issues were also the topic of a recent Lorentz Center workshop, the key take-away messages of which are highlighted in this Perspective. In particular, we discuss why the choice between constant potential and constant charge simulations is less trivial than it may seem, why interpreting electrochemical reaction free energy diagrams can be challenging, why the Poisson-Nernst-Planck equation is not all there is, and why we desperately need more benchmarking in the field.
Abstract from OpenAlex , checked 2026-06-30.
Citation
Govindarajan, N.; Kastlunger, G.; Gauthier, J.; Cheng, J.; Filot, I.A.W.; Hagopian, A.; Hansen, H.; Huang, J.; Kowalski, P.; Liu, J.; Lombardi, J.; Maraschin, M.; Peterson, A.; Pillai, H.; Prats, H.; Price, C. J.; van Roij, R.; Rossmeisl, J.; Seemakurthi, R. R.; Shin, S.-J.; Smith, A.; Zhu, J.-X.; Doblhoff-Dier, K. The Intricacies of Computational Electrochemistry. ACS Energy Lett. 2025, 10 (9), 4277–4288. 10.1021/acsenergylett.5c00748
Metric Source
Citation markers are read from Scopus when configured, with public DOI metadata as fallback, and cached locally. They can differ from Pure counts shown on institutional portals. Checked 2026-07-09 via Scopus.